Updates from August, 2018 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • penguin 12:18 on 2018-08-26 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , postgres   

    Databases with dokku 

    This is part 2 of a couple of blog posts about dokku, a amazing little Heroku clone.

    In the previous post I showed how to set up Dokku on a DigitalOcean droplet, and deployed a little hello-world container with a single git push. The reason why I wanted dokku thoug was the need of a database. As said – hosting comes cheap, databases usually come either expensive or with limited flexibility, or just too annoying configuration effort.

    Dokku is the perferct middle ground. Let’s see why.

    For me it was the existing postgres plugin which you can simply install and use. The whole process is incredibly easy, takes wbout two commands, and looks like this (let’s assume our “hello world” container uses a database):

    That’s it, again.

    This creates a database container with postgres 10.2, as you can see. You can influence a lot of behavior by using environment variables, see the GitHub page for more info.

    Then you link the container to the running app:

    And done.

    What happened? You have now the environment variable $DATABASE_URL set in the hello-world app, that’s why the restart was necessary (which you can postpone, if you want, but you probably need it now, right?).

    Let’s check:

    That’s it. Super easy. Now if you’re using Django, you could use kennethreitz/dj-database-url to automatically parse and use it, and you’re done. (Probably every framework has something similar, so just have a look).

     
  • penguin 18:10 on 2018-08-25 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , digitalocean, , , heroku, , howto   

    Build your own PaaS with Dokku 

    I was looking for some “play” deployment method for a couple of things I want to try out. Most of them require a database. And it should be cheap, cause I don’t have any load on them and don’t earn any money, so I don’t want to spend basically no money if possible. The usual suspects are too expensive – AWS, Heroku, etc.

    So I looked around and found Dokku.

    Dokku is a set of – hang on – shell scripts – which basically emulate Heroku on a machine of your own. It’s integrated with Digital Ocean droplets out of the box, if you want it. And the whole thing is 5 € / month, which is perfect. It also integrates with a Dockerfile based deployment, so you do git push and everything just works.

    It’s amazing.

    This is how you get started. But before you can get started, you need a domain you control, either on AWS or any other hoster. This is for routing traffic to your deployments later. You also need a public SSH key, or better a public / private key pair. Once you have both you can …

    1. create a Digital Ocean account, and …
    2. add your SSH public key to your account, and …
    3. in that account, create a new droplet with a “Dokku” image preinstalled.
    4. Wait until the droplet finished provisioning.

    While the droplet is being created, you can also create a project locally to test it later:

    In this little test project we only create a Dockerfile from an hello-world image which displays “Hello world” in a browser so we can verify it worked.

    Once the droplet is done, you can start setting up your personal little PaaS. First, you have to configure your DNS. We will set up a wildcard entry for our deployments, and a non-wildcard entry for git. Let’s assume your domain is for-myself.com, then you would add …

    • my-paas.for-myself.com , type “A” (or “AAAA” if you are IPv6) to your droplet IP
    • *.my-paas.for-myself.com just the same

    Then you SSH into your droplet, and create your dokku project. (This is something you have to do for every project). All you have to do for this is:

    Done.

    Now you configure a git remote URL for your project, and push it:

    Again – done. If you push your project now (assuming DNS is already set), everything should happen automagically:

    And if you open your URL now (which is hello-world.my-paas.for-myself.com) you should see this image:

    Now, for 5 € / month you get:

    • A heroku-like, no-nonsense, fully automated, git-based deployment platform
    • A server which you control (and have to maintain, okay, but on which you can deploy …)
    • A database (or many of them – dokku provides great integration for databases btw; more on that in another post)
    • Publicly reachable deployments (for customers, testing, whatever)
    • Let’s Encrypt certificates (dokku provides support for these as well, again more in a later post)
    • And for 1 € more (it’s always 20% of the base price) you get backups of your system)

    That’s absolutely incredible. Oh, and did I mention that the maintainers are not only friendly, but also super responsive and incredibly helpful on Slack?

     
  • penguin 16:14 on 2017-04-13 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , elastic beanstalk   

    Elastic Beanstalk with Docker using Terraform 

    I just investigate AWS Elastic Beanstalk. And I want to use terraform for this. This is what I’ve done, and how I’ve got it running. I basically do this because the docs for this are either super-long (and are still missing critical points) or super-short (and are also missing critical points), at least what I’ve found.

    This should get you up and running in very little time. You can also get all the code from a demo github repository.

    General principles

    The Architectural Overview is a good page to read to get an idea of what you’re about to do. It’s not that long.

    In short, Elastic Beanstalk runs a version of an application in an environment. So the process is: Declaring an application, defining a couple of versions and environments, and then combine one specific version with one specific environment of an app to create an actually running deployment.

    The environment is just a set of hosts configured in a special way (autoscaling & triggers, subnets, roles, etc.), whereas the application version is the info about how to deploy the containers on that environment (ports, env variables, etc.). Naturally, you think of having a DEV environment which runs “latest”, and a PROD environment which runs “stable” or so. Go crazy.

    Prerequisites & Preparation

    For the example here you need a couple of things & facts:

    • An AWS account
    • In that account, you need:
      • an S3 bucket to save your app versions
      • a VPC ID
      • subnet IDs for the instance networks
      • an IAM roles for the hosts
      • an IAM service roles elastic beanstalk. (see bottom for how to create that)
    • Terraform 🙂
    • The aws command line client

    Get started

    The files in the repository have way more parameters, but this is the basic set which should get you running (I tried once, then added all that stuff). The main.tf  file below will create the application and an environment associated with it.

    If you run this, at least one host and one ELB should appear in the defined subnets. Still, this is an empty environment, there’s no app running in it. If if you ask yourself, “where’s the version he talked about?” – well, it’s not in there. We didn’t create one yet. This is just the very basic platform you need to run a version of an app.

    In my source repo you can now just use the script app_config_create_and_upload.sh , followed by deploy.sh . You should be able to figure out how to use them, and they should work out of the box. But we’re here to explain, so this is what happens behind the scenes if you do this:

    1. create a file “ Dockerrun.aws.json ” with the information about the service (Docker image, etc.) to deploy
    2. upload that file into an S3 bucket, packed into a ZIP file (see “final notes” below)
    3. tell Elastic Beanstalk to create a new app version using the info from that file (on S3)

    That obviously was app_config_create_and_upload.sh . The next script, deploy.sh , does this:

    1. tell EBS to actually deploy that configuration using the AWS cli.

    This is the Dockerrun.aws.json  file which describes our single-container test application:

    See “final notes” for the “ContainerPort” directive.

    I also guess you know how to upload a file to S3, so I’ll skip that. If not, look in the script. The Terraform declaration to add the version to Elastic Beanstalk looks like this: (if you used my script, a file called app_version_<VERSION>.tf  was created for you automatically with pretty much this content):

    Finally, deploying this using the AWS cli:

    All done correctly, this should be it, and you should be able to access your app now under your configured address.

    Wrap up & reasoning

    My repo works, at least for me (I hope for you as well). I did not yet figure out the autoscaling, for which I didn’t have time. I will catch up in a 2nd blog post once I figured that out. First tests gave pretty weird results 🙂 .

    The reason why I did this (when I have Rancher available for me) is the auto-scaling, and the host-management. I don’t need to manage any more hosts and Docker versions and Rancher deployments just to deploy a super-simle, CPU-intensive, scaling production workload, which relies on very stable (even pretty conservative) components in that way. Also I learned something.

    Finally, after reading a lot of postings and way to much AWS docs, I am surprised how easy this thing actually is. It certainly doesnt look that way if you start reading up on it. I tried to catch the essence of the whole process in that blog post.

    Final notes & troubleshooting

    1. I have no idea what the aws_elastic_beanstalk_configuration_template  Terraform resource is for. I would like to understand it, but the documentation is rather … sparse.
    2. The solution stack name has semantic meaning. You must set something that AWS understands. This can be found out by using the following command:
      $ aws elasticbeanstalk list-available-solution-stacks 
      … or on the AWS documentation. Whatever is to your liking.
    3. If you don’t specify a security group ( aws:autoscaling:launchconfiguration  – “ SecurityGroups “) one will be created for you automatically. That might not be convenient because this means that on “terraform destroy” this group might not be destroyed automatically. (which is just a guess, I didn’t test this)
    4. The same goes for the auto scaling group scaling rules.
    5. When trying the minimal example, be extra careful when you can’t access the service after everything is there. The standard settings seem to be: Same subnet for ELB and hosts (obviously), and public ELB (with public IPv4 address). Now, placing a public-facing ELB into an internal-only subnet does not work, right? 🙂
    6. The ZIP file: According to the docs you can only upload the JSON file (or the Dockerfile file if you build the container in the process) to S3. But the docs are not extremely clear, and Terraform did not mention this. So I am using ZIPs which works just fine.
    7. The ContainerPort is always the port the applications listens on in the container, it is not the port which is opened to the outside. That always seems to be 80 (at least for single-container deployments)

    Appendix I: Create ServiceRole IAM role

    For some reason on the first test run this did not seem to be necessary. On all subsequent runs it was, though. This is the way to create this. Sorry that I couldn’t figure out how to do this with Terraform.

    • open AWS IAM console
    • click “Create new role”
    • Step 1 – select role type: choose “AWS service role”, and under that “AWS Elastic Beanstalk”
    • Step 2 – establish trust: is skipped by the wizard after this
    • Step 3 – Attach policy: Check both policies in the table (should be “AWSElasticBeanstalkEnhancedHealth”, and “AWSElasticBeanstalkService”)
    • Step 4 – Set role name and review: Enter a role name (e.g. “aws-elasticbeanstalk-service-role”), and hit “Create role”

    Now you can use (if you chose that name) “aws-elasticbeanstalk-service-role” as your ServiceRole parameter.

    Appendix II: Sources

     
  • penguin 13:31 on 2017-01-12 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , logging, , ops   

    Logs with docker and logstash 

    It would be nice to have all container logs from a docker cluster sent to … let’s say, an ELK stack. Right?

    Right.

    So we did:

    • on each host in the cluster, we use the GELF log driver to send all logs to a logstash instance
    • the logstash instance clones each request using type “ELK”
    • to the “ELK” clone, it adds the token for the external ELK service
    • the “ELK” clone goes out to the external ELK cluster
    • the original event goes to S3.

    Here’s how.

    (More …)

     
    • David Sanftenberg 09:30 on 2017-07-04 Permalink | Reply

      Multiline gelf filters are no longer supported in 5.x of Logstash it seems. I’m considering downgrading to 4.x for this, as we use a lot of microservices and many JSONs are logged simultaneously, really messing up our logs. Thanks for the writeup.

  • penguin 16:06 on 2015-11-26 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , s3,   

    Docker registry, S3 and permissions 

    There are a couple of bazillion blog posts saying “yah just did my docker registry on S3”.

    It’s not so easy, though. Cause what if you want to limit access to a certain IAM user? Yup, you need to go deep (well, a bit) into the policy thing of Amazon. Which sounds simple, but isn’t.

    I got “HTTP 500” errors from the docker registry when I first deployed. My configuration, which was wrong, looked like this:

    Since this didn’t work really well, I googled my a** off and found a little post, which used a UserPolicy (instead of a bucket policy, which is basically the other way around), but did one thing different. My working configuration is now … (let’s see if you can see the difference):

    See it?

    It’s the two resources now. You need not only “resource/*” as a target, you also need “resource” itself as a target. Which makes sense if you know it and think about it. If you don’t … it’s a bit annoying. And time-consuming.

     
  • penguin 15:32 on 2015-07-15 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Docker, http and TLS 

    Today seems to be “annoyme-day”.

    This error message with docker:

    … does not necessarily mean that we use http:// instead of https://.

    It can also mean that the docker service is not running:

    Took me 15 minutes.

     
  • penguin 13:59 on 2015-07-15 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Docker and proxies 

    … so I don’t forget.

    “docker pull” will not use the HTTP_PROXY variable. Why? Because “docker” is just the cli program which tells the daemon what to do. And the daemon probably does not know about the variable if just set in the terminal.

    So, what to do to make docker use it described pretty well here: https://docs.docker.com/articles/systemd/#http-proxy

    Next thing: Don’t forget to go “systemctl daemon-reload”, because otherwise this will not be effective, even with “systemctl restart docker”.

    Done.

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel